And that's why I was careful not to claim it actually *was* AI-written. But certain patterns are overused by AI nowadays. Oppositions like this stick out a bit:
> The relevant question is not whether the rhetoric has shifted, but whether the rhetorical shift will translate into actual buildings.
Not a bad article, but some paragraphs have a writing style reminiscent of AI, which is a bit distracting.
https://www.pangram.com/history/09d62c9d-39bb-4117-9d18-a381b24d7112?ucc=VNr0OhXFr4s
About that
And that's why I was careful not to claim it actually *was* AI-written. But certain patterns are overused by AI nowadays. Oppositions like this stick out a bit:
> The relevant question is not whether the rhetoric has shifted, but whether the rhetorical shift will translate into actual buildings.
Not proud of that line, but for some reason lines like this work.
Good stuff, but it would be even better if you didn’t force Costco to give undeserved windfalls to random poor people.